Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 92.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3279mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 is better than the Galaxy A50, with a general score of 92.5 against 83.8. The Apple iPhone 14 design is incredibly newer than the Galaxy A50's, but it is a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The iPhone 14 features a better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 14 has a brighter display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532. Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 14, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in low light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 14, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has better battery duration than Apple iPhone 14, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A50, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.