Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro has a global score of 95.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A50's score of 83.8. IPhone 14 Pro is a incredibly newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A50, but it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1179 x 2556 pixels.
IPhone 14 Pro counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with greater battery performance than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone 14 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.