Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a score of 94.9, which is much better than Galaxy A50's global score of 83.8. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's body is newer than Galaxy A50's, although it's just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a greater amount of RAM.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a better 1290 x 2796 resolution, a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much better storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
IPhone 14 Pro Max has a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a lot more mega pixels camera. The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A50. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A50, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.