Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-03-15 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the iPhone 6s's 83 score. The Galaxy A50 construction is a lot newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the iPhone 6s. IPhone 6s features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 6s features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a lot smaller display, a just a bit inferior pixels count per inch in the screen and a lot lower 1334 x 750px resolution. The Galaxy A50 has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 6s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 features a superior battery duration than iPhone 6s, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy A50 takes clearer photos and videos than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a way larger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.