Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's score of 83.8. The Apple iPhone X is a a little bit heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A50, but both are equally thin. The iPhone X features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The iPhone X features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy A50 has just a bit more storage to install games and applications than iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh. Samsung Galaxy A50 and iPhone X feature extremely similar cameras, because although the iPhone X has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality photos, a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A50, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.