Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-07-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Storm White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 18 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro, with an 83.8 score against 79.6. The Galaxy A50 is an older phone than the Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro, but Samsung made it notably thinner and much lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better performance than Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2448px and a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots greater pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro, although it has a camera with a lot worse 25 mega-pixels resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.