Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Space Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate's global score of 83.2. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is extremely lighter and noticeably thinner than the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2448. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A50 features a really superior performance than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a very superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.