Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-03-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's global score of 76.1. Galaxy A50's body is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Galaxy A50 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a way more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.