Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), having an 83.8 score against 77.8. Galaxy A50 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner device than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has more RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has just a bit better display than Galaxy A50. Both of them have a same size screen, a better pixels number in each screen inch and exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a way more MP camera. Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.