Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Google Nexus 6, having a general score of 83.8 against 81.1. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a much newer cellphone, and it is also way thinner and just a little lighter than Google Nexus 6. The Google Nexus 6 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A50, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Google Nexus 6 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little better number of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a way more MP back camera and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.