Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50 is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel, it's thinner and notably newer. Google Pixel counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a higher number of cores. Galaxy A50 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and a way more MP camera.
Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.