Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 83.8 score against 81.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Google Pixel 4 were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy A50's design is just a bit thinner but just a little heavier than the Google Pixel 4.
Google Pixel 4 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.