Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a, with an 83.8 score against 82.9. Galaxy A50 is an older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 4a counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the Galaxy A50 one, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh. Galaxy A50 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 25 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.