Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is extremely older than Honor 50 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. Honor 50 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A50 has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Honor 50 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. The Honor 50 Pro features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A50.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.