Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 403 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A50's global score of 83.8. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is notably newer than Galaxy A50's, although it is thicker and noticeably heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger display, a little more pixels per inch of display and a better 1280 x 2800px resolution.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a way better video quality, a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a way better resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A50, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.