Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the HTC U11, getting an 83.8 score against 77.6. The Galaxy A50 is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the HTC U11. The HTC U11 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A50 features just a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera with a way better 25 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.