Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs, having a score of 83.8 against 76.9. Galaxy A50 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the HTC U11 EYEs. Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little better amount of pixels in each screen inch and a quite bigger display.
HTC U11 EYEs has a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster processor than HTC U11 EYEs. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 captures a bit better videos and photos than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Galaxy A50 also has a way better 25 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.