Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Coffee Black and Snow White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 644 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the HTC U23 Pro, getting a general score of 83.8 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an a lot older cellphone than the HTC U23 Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Galaxy A50 counts with a much powerful CPU than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better looking display than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better camera than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. HTC U23 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.