Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is just a little thinner but a little heavier than the LG G7 Fit, and both were released with only 4 months difference. The LG G7 Fit has a brighter screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 takes clearer videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has a way larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations, a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and a back camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy A50 features improved battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.