Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than LG K52's general score of 76. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than the LG K52, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a brighter display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
LG K52 has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 features a processing unit that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50's CPU, both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
LG K52's battery duration is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50's battery duration. The Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG K52, because although it has a worse 1920x1080 video definition, a lot tinier sensor and a back camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.