Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than LG K62, having an 83.8 score against 78.2. The Galaxy A50 is an older phone than the LG K62, but it is a bit thinner and lighter anyway. The LG K62 features a CPU that is very similar to Galaxy A50's processor, both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a better display than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and pictures, a camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
LG K62 features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K62 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 and Samsung Galaxy A50 both count with extremely similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.