Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's 83.8 score. The LG K92 is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A50, but it is heavier and just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little better performance than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels in each display inch. The LG K92 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
LG K92 counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to Galaxy A50's battery performance.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG K92, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A50, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.