Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than LG Q70, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better processing power than LG Q70. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit better looking display than LG Q70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy A50 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display. The LG Q70 has a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Q70 counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy A50's battery life. The LG Q70 takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have a 0.36 inches sensor, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more megapixels back camera and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.