Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older device than the LG Stylo 6, but Samsung made it way lighter and thinner anyway. LG Stylo 6 and Samsung Galaxy A50 feature very similar displays, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
LG Stylo 6 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy A50 one, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A50 and the LG Stylo 6 feature quite similar battery performance. Galaxy A50 shoots much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.