Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the LG V10, getting a general score of 83.8 against 78.6. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than LG V10. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a greater performance than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger number of faster cores.
LG V10 has a much better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. LG V10 counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V10 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited environments and a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A50 has longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.