Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is newer, but just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A50 has improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Galaxy A50 features just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.