Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a general score of 83.8 against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction has the same thickness than LG V40 ThinQ, but it is a little bit lighter. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos, a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with improved battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A50 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.