Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50's global score of 83.8. LG V60 ThinQ's design is newer than Samsung Galaxy A50's, but it's thicker and much heavier. LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 and the LG V60 ThinQ both count with quite similar displays, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot better video resolution and a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A50. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A50, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.