Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A50's 83.8 overall score. The LG Wing design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A50's, although it's noticeably thicker and a lot heavier. LG Wing features a display that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50's screen, because although the LG Wing has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Wing features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG Wing's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50 one. LG Wing counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A50. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A50, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.