Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Forged Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Defy (2021)'s 77.2 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50 is extremely older than Motorola Defy (2021), it's design is a lot thinner and way lighter. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Defy (2021). They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A50 has a sharper screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A50 features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has more internal memory.
Motorola Defy (2021) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.