Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, having a global score of 87.1 against 83.8. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's design is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy A50's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A50 features just a little better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Galaxy A50, both have the same internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.