Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 general score. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro is way newer than the Galaxy A50, it's a bit thicker and heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.