Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2024), with a global score of 83.8 against 78.5. Galaxy A50's design is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge (2024), although it was released many years before. Motorola Edge (2024) has a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A50 has a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge (2024) features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.