Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with an 83.8 score against 78.5. The Galaxy A50 design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it's a bit lighter. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a greater camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.