Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 general score. The Galaxy A50 is a incredibly older and just a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but Samsung could make it just a little bit thinner anyway. Galaxy A50 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo feature really similar CPUs, and although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo count with similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count per inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and higher 120 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo feature really similar batteries duration, although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a 0 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.