Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with an 83.8 score against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an a lot older device than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but it is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.