Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 global score. The Galaxy A50 body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 40, but it is just a little bit lighter. Galaxy A50 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a quite better screen pixels density, a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 40 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because it has a back camera with a lot better resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a much better video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy A50 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.