Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's general score of 77. The Galaxy A50 is an notably older device than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it's a bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A50 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.