Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 83.4. The Galaxy A50 construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Galaxy A50 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better video quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.