Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. The Galaxy A50 design is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.