Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting a global score of 83.8 against 78.9. Galaxy A50 has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because it has a way higher video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.