Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A50, getting a global score of 86.3 against 83.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is extremely newer than the Galaxy A50, it's just a little thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A50 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a much more megapixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.