Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, with a overall score of 87.1 against 83.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A50, it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A50 has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution, a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.