Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting an 83.8 score against 81.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is extremely thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola Moto G 5G, although it was released around 21 months before. Galaxy A50 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G 5G counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a back camera with a much better resolution and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.