Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's global score of 82.6. Galaxy A50's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Moto G 5G Plus, even though it was released only 16 months before. The Moto G 5G Plus's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50's processing unit, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus and Samsung Galaxy A50 feature quite similar displays, although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a little bit higher screen density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much higher video definition.
The Moto G 5G Plus features improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.