Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 83.8 score against 76.1. Although the Galaxy A50 is older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's design is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Power. They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite better display density. The Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A50 features just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the same aperture, the same video frame rate and a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy A50 also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels. The Moto G Power features improved battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 costs more than Motorola Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.