Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), with an 83.8 score against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), even though it was released just 22 months before. Galaxy A50 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a much higher pixels quantity per screen inch.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto G Power (2021). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has a camera with lot more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy A50 costs more money than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.