Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), having an 83.8 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), even though it was released just 22 months before. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and the same internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Moto G Stylus (2021) both count with very similar battery durations.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.