Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cosmic Emerald |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), with an 83.8 score against 82.1. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although it was released 2 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A50 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.