Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with an 83.8 score against 76. Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy A50 features a much better performing processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A50 features a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in low light environments and a lot tinier sensor taking way worse quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.